Om Parkash & ORS v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CWP-12776-2018 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12776-2018 Date of Decision: July 24, 2018 Om Parkash and others .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA

Present:

Mr.Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioners. ........

SURYA KANT, J.(ORAL) As per Office report, respondent Nos.1 and 3 have been served, however, no one appears on their behalf.

[2] The short relief sought in the instant writ petition is that the petitioners fall within the category of 'Oustees' and are entitled to allotment of a residential plot under the 'Oustees Policy' read with Full Bench judgment of this Court in CWP No.22252 of 2016, decided on 22.11.2017 (Rajiv Manchanda and others vs HUDA, Panchkula and others ). [3] The above-stated relief has been sought on the premise that the land of the petitioners measuring 4K 12 M situated within the revenue estate of village Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar, fully described in para 2 of the writ petition was acquired by State of Haryana vide Award dated 24.04.1998. It is further averred that somewhat similar controversy has been resolved by this Court in CWP-11670-2017 (Sarita vs State of Haryana and others) decided on 23.04.2018 (Annexure P-5).

Meenu 2018.07.31 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CWP-12776-2018 -2- [4] The instant writ petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms and let petitioners claim be also decided in accordance with para 4 of the above-cited order.

( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE July 24, 2018 ( SUDIP AHLUWALIA ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2018.07.31 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh