High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/18093/2016disposed of

Bsnl And ANR v. Sukhwinder Singh And ORS

2016-09-14Mr. Justice Surinder Gupta,Mrs Justice Daya Chaudhary2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Civil Writ Petition No.18093 of 2016 Date of decision: September 14, 2016 Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and another ....Petitioners versus Sukhwinder Singh and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN *****

Present:

Mr. K.B. Sharma, Advocate for Mr. D.R. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. R.S. Dadwal, Advocate for Mr. Raj Kumar Sharma, Advocate for caveator-respondent No.1.

***** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) 1.

In the instant writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 08.10.2015 (Annexure P-2) passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (in short 'the Tribunal') (respondent No.4) in O.A. No.060/00864/2015, whereby the Tribunal has granted interim relief to respondent No.1 in the same terms as granted in O.A. No.060/00295/2015 titled as 'Parkash Vir and another vs. BSNL' dated 23.04.2015 (Annexure P-3) vide which the Tribunal has restrained the BSNL/petitioners from making promotions in the cadre of Chief Accounts officer (CAO) whereas in the present OA, the Tribunal has stayed the promotion of Assistant General Manager/Divisional Engineer (Telecom).

Sonia Kinra 2016.09.21 13:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

Civil Writ Petition No.18093 of 2016 -2- ---- 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the impugned order dated 08.10.2015 (Annexure P-2) passed by the Tribunal has merged into the final order and the O.A. filed by respondent No.1 has been allowed. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that in view of the order passed by the Tribunal, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such. 3.

Ordered accordingly.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (RAMENDRA JAIN) September 14, 2016 JUDGE sonia gugnani Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No Whether reportable?

Yes/No Sonia Kinra 2016.09.21 13:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh