Sultan Singh v. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited And ORS

Civil Writ Petition No.14559 of 2017 --1--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14559 of 2017 DECIDED ON: July 10, 2017 SULTAN SINGH ..PETITIONER...

VERSUS

UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM ..RESPONDENTS...

LTD. AND OTHERS

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH

Present:

Mr. Narinder Singh Behgal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

***** JASPAL SINGH, J. (Oral) By virtue of instant civil writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the official respondents to count the work charge period i.e. from 14.12.1973 to 06.11.1988 and 07.11.1988 to 16.05.1992 (14.12.1973 to 06.11.1988, the services was rendered by him in HSMITC and thereafter he was transferred to the erstwhile HSEB on 07.11.1998), towards the qualifying service and respondent fix the pension by counting the same and also grant him arrears with interest @ 18% per annum. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though a legal notice dated 19.02.2017 (Annexure P-3) was served upon the respondents but till date no action has been taken by the respondents.

3.

The instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the official Sonika 2017.07.11 11:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Civil Writ Petition No.14559 of 2017 --2-- respondent(s) to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in his legal notice dated 19.02.2017 (Annexure P-3) and take an appropriate decision particularly keeping in view the instructions containing in memo No.CH2440/CAO/UH/Pen, dated 18.04.2014 (Annexure P-1) within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. July 10, 2017 (JASPAL SINGH) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

Yes/No Sonika 2017.07.11 11:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh