← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/37812/2021allowed

Satish v. State Of Haryana

2021-11-12Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur2 pages

CRM-M No. 37812 of 2021 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRM-M No. 37812 of 2021 Date of Decision: 12.11.2021 Satish ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Ajit Singh Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

**** SURESHWAR THAKUR , J.

(ORAL) (Through video conferencing) FIR bearing No. 113 of 6.5.2021, constituting therein offences embodied under Sections 148, 149, 323, 341, 452 and 506 IPC, and also, Sections 307 and 325 IPC (added later on), is registered against the petitioner-bail applicant at Police Station Uklana, District Hisar. 2.

The victim-injured, as fairly submitted by the learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, has been discharged from the hospital concerned. He also submits that after completing investigations into the offences (supra), the investigating officer concerned, has instituted a report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. before the learned Magistrate concerned. 3.

Bearing in mind that the investigations into the offences (supra) is complete, besides bearing in mind the further fact that there is no endangerment to the life of the victim-injured. Therefore, this Court is constrained not to prolong the judicial incarceration of the bail applicantGURPREET SINGH 2021.11.12 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M No. 37812 of 2021 -2accused, as he is stated to be in judicial incarceration for the last five months.

4.

Consequently, the instant petition is allowed, and, the petitioner-bail applicant is ordered to be released from judicial custody. However, the granting of bail is subject to the bail applicant-petitioner's furnishing personal and surety bonds in the sum of `50,000/- each, before the learned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned, and, also subject to his not tampering with prosecution evidence, and, his not influencing prosecution witnesses, and, besides also his appearing before the trial Court concerned, as and when directed to make his personal appearance.

5.

Copy dasti.

(SURESHWAR THAKUR) JUDGE November 12, 2021 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

Yes GURPREET SINGH 2021.11.12 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh