Neeraj Jindal v. Sahil Makkar And Another
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: Neeraj Jindal
...Petitioner
Versus
Sahil Makkar and another .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present:
Mr. Ritender Rathee, Advocate, for the petitioner.
****
, J. (Oral)
!
"
!
# $ %
&'(
)
*!
$* +( &
, -
,'' .-
/ *
, 011
2
)
'
4-
/ *
) 5 6'
!
3
!
4, 011
-
3
6 3
"
) !
"
"
3 %
3 %
'
%" A perusal of the interim orders passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Panipat, reveals that the petitioner was present and was partly examined, whereas his cross-examination was deferred. Further, vide the impugned order dated
14.10.2025, it was observed that no PW was present and that several opportunities had already been granted to the petitioner/plaintiff to conclude his evidence, but he had failed to do so and there is no justification to further adjourn the matter for plaintiff evidence. Accordingly, the evidence of the petitioner/plaintiff was closed by order of the Court and the case was fixed for the evidence of the respondents/defendants.
7
"
!
/
")
!
)
#
!
"
!
3
"
3 )
)
!
1 3
:
!
" 3 ""
!
"
!
!
"
)
!
!)
3
"
!
# $ %
&'( The petitioner is directed to appear before the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Panipat, on the date already fixed and thereafter, the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Panipat, is directed to
grant one effective opportunity to the petitioner/plaintiff to conclude his entire evidence, subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- as costs to be deposited with the concerned District Legal Services Authority.
& !
) 0)
$05 -+;5 , -<9 <5;=8(
*>+<;
Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes / No Whether reportable :
Yes / No