Jobanjit Singh v. State Of Punjab And Another
!"#"
$%&&'' ( ''''
)*# ( ( ( % +, ' (( ,
! """""
( , -'
# $ % &!' ( !)!* + , -. !/* !!)'!)!* *!* *!& */# &)0 */ . , % 1
2 %3 %% + % , ,
!!)/!)!& 24 5!3 6
6 !
7 #/)8!)!& %%6, 6 "The petitioner has approached this Court seeking quashing of FIR (Annexure P
1) and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of a compromise having been effected between the parties.
Notice of motion.
At this stage, Mr. Jatinder Pal Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab, has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.1 and accepts notice. Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate has appeared and filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.2. The same be taken on record.
The parties are directed to get their statements recorded qua the factum of compromise in the following manner:
(i) The petitioner shall appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate concerned on 21.07.2025 or any date thereafter as fixed by trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording statements of the petitioner as well as of the complainant qua the factum of compromise. As and when any such appearance is made, the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate shall do the needful for recording the statements of the parties qua the factum of the compromise. It shall be open to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to either record the statements of the parties by physical process or by video conferencing as deemed appropriate by the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate.
(ii) In case the statement is to be recorded by way of video conferencing, the parties concerned shall be duly identified through video conferencing by their respective counsel, subject to the satisfaction of the Presiding Officer. (iii) The trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate may also choose to get the statements of the parties recorded through some Commissioner, appointed by the Court who would be some Advocate having sufficient standing at the Bar. In case the statement is recorded through some Commissioner, such Commissioner/Advocate shall furnish an affidavit after recording statements to the effect that the parties had appeared before him/her and he/she had recorded their statements as per law and that the said parties had been duly identified by their respective counsel. This shall be subject to satisfaction of trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate.
After recording the statements of all the affected parties in either of the aforesaid manner, the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate shall submit its report on the basis of the statements so recorded as to whether all the affected parties have entered into a compromise and as to whether the compromise in question is found to be a valid compromise and has been effected without there being any kind of influence or coercion. The trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate shall also report as regards the following facts after seeking information from Investigating Officer, concerned:
(i) Whether there is any other accused other than the petitioners, arrayed in this petition?
(ii) Whether there is any other complainant or affected/ aggrieved party other than the respondents, arrayed in the petition?
(iii) Whether any accused has been declared Proclaimed Offender?
The report be submitted before this Court before the next date of hearing i.e.11.08.2025."
* )8)'!)!& 5 % 9 %
, 6 : $ % %%65
"It is submitted that on 21.07.2025, complainant namely Kirandeep Sharma son of late Purshotam Dutt r/o House No. 1571/29, Preet Colony, Roopnagar appeared in the court and his statement was recorded regarding compromise. He suffered a statement that he had gol registered the present FIR against Jobanjit Singh s/o Pishora Singh r/o H. No. 1031, Hargobind Avenue, Majitha road, Amritsar and he is the only complainant/injured/aggrieved in this case. That he has compromised the matter with abovesaid accused out of his free will, without any coercion. inducement, threat or pressure. That he has no objection in the present FIR is quashed. That there is no other complainant/aggrieved person. That no accused is proclaimed offender in this case.
Thereafter, accused Jobanjit Jagjit Singh also suffered his statement that he has compromised the matter with complainant Kirandeep Sharma. That the compromise has been effected out of his free will, without any coercion, inducement, threat or pressure. That there is no other accused in the present FIR. That Kirandeep Sharma is the only complainant/aggrieved person in this case. That he has never been declared proclaimed offender. Thereafter on 04.08.2025, Investigating Officer SI Gurdev Singh, No. 353/SAS Nagar, PS City Kharar also appeared and got his statement recorded. He has stated that the present IIR was συγίοισινα the instance of Kirandeep Sharma who is the only complainant/victim in this case. That there is only one accused namely Jobanjit Singh. That the parties are not involved or declared proclaimed offender in any other criminal case. That no other FIR is registered against accused.
It is, accordingly, submitted on the basis of statement given by Investigating Officer that there is no accused other than the petitioner namely Jobanjit Singh. That there is no other complainant or affected/aggrieved party other than the respondents and the accused has not been declared proclaimed offender. It is also submitted that compromise is genuine, voluntary and without coercion or undue influence. "
/ ; % !
,
-. %% , + + & % %1 % %
-. +
24 5!3 0 .
% %
%%1 , ,
8 $ <= % 4 %1 % 6 4 /'! + , 5
%
!"
# $
"
% &' !
( !
( !"
# $ #!)&$
) *& !
+
! "
# $ #!)&$
#!)& ,**& -
.
/ . *) !"
$ $ % 6 , 1 <= % 4 (a) Power u/s 482 Cr.P.C. vested with this Court is much wider and is unaffected by Section 320 of the Code.
(b) However, wider the power greater the caution. (c) The underlining principle while exercising such power is that it can be invoked to quash the proceedings recognizing compromise between the parties in the matters which are overwhelmingly and predominantly of civil character like commercial transactions or arising out of matrimonial relationship or family disputes. (d) The said power is not to be exercised in the prosecutions involving heinous and serious offences of mental depravity or offences like murder, rape, dacoity etc. as such offences are not private in nature and have a serious impact on society.
(e) Section 482 Cr.P.C. casts duty upon the High Court to advance interest of justice as well. It is in recognition of this duty casted upon the High Court, that Apex Court held that the High Court would not refuse to quash FIR under Section 307 merely because FIR finds mention thereof. High Court can assess nature of injuries sustained, whether such injuries inflicted on vital/delicate parts of the body/nature of weapons used etc. (f) Such exercise at the hands of High Court would be permissible only after the evidence is collected after investigation and chargesheet is filed/charges framed during the trial. Such exercise cannot be carried out while the matter is still under investigation. (g) While quashing FIR in non compoundable offences even which are of private in nature, High Court is required to consider
antecedents of the accused, conduct of the accused and whether he was absconding or whether he has managed the complainant to enter into a compromise.
$ 1 &!' ( !)!*
1 /'! #>8* $
% % 6 6% %1 &!' ( !)!* 6%% ' $ :, 6 4
? &!' ( !)!* + -. 5 (i) Putting a quietus to the proceedings will bring peace and tranquility amongst parties & will accordingly further the cause of substantial justice.
(ii) The offences alleged are primarily of private nature. (iii) The parties have compromised.
(iv) As per the report received the compromise is said to be voluntary in its nature.
(v) Complainant/victim is reported to have entered into compromise on his own volition >
+%1 %%6 -. !/* !!)'!)!* *!* *!& */# &)0 */ . , % 1 2 %3 %% + % , ,
!!)/!)!& 24 5!3 1 + + #) , % 23 1 %% % .( ,/ &&'' jatin @ :,? A? @
% A?