Ciena Communiations Inc. v. Dcit/Acit International Taxation, Gurgaon And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP-18537-2016 Date of decision: 04.02.2025 Ciena Communication Inc.

.... Petition Vs.

DCIT/ACIT International Taxation Gurgaon and another .... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Present:

Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Senior Standing counsel for the respondent.

ARUN PALLI, J (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondent submits that, although a detailed written statement on behalf of the respondents has already been filed, but, since, despite repeated opportunities, the petitioner has failed to comply with the order dated July 24, 2017, the petition deserves to the dismissed. In response, learned counsel for the petitioner, as always, fairly submits that despite repeated communications and reminders, none on behalf of the petitioner has chosen to pursue the matter. Therefore, the petition be disposed of as not pressed.

Ordered accordingly.

(ARUN PALLI) JUDGE (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 04.02.2025 deepak Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR 2025.02.05 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P & H High Court, Chandigarh