Pappu v. State Of Punjab

121IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32675 of 2020 Date of Decision: 14.10.2020 Pappu

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL Present:- Mr. Tarun Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jagmohan Ghumman, DAG, Punjab.

DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (ORAL) Case taken up through Video Conferencing.

Through the present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner seeks the grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.49 dated 01.05.2020, registered under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 at Police Station City Rampura, District Bathinda.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case; no recovery has been made from his conscious possession and the petitioner is not involved in any other case. As per the case of the prosecution the petitioner was apprehended and from his conscious possession 8000 tablets of Clovidol100 SR were recovered which were with him without any valid permit or licence.

In view of the above serious allegations against the petitioner as also for the reason that without any explanation he did not appear before the trial Court on 29.9.2020 he is not found entitled to any relief. Dismissed.

(DEEPAK SIBAL) October 14, 2020 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2020.10.16 08:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document