Kashmir Singh And ORS v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.15058 of 2017 Date of decision: 14.07.2017 Kashmir Singh and others ..Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others ..Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY

Present:

Mr. R.K. Arya, Advocate for the petitioners.

*** Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ petition is that their juniors have been promoted but their claim has not been considered in spite of making representation to the respondents authorities. The petitioners are higher in the seniority list as they are at Sr. Nos.626, 630, 634, 640, 641, 661, 278-A, 398 respectively whereas their juniors, who have been promoted, are at Sr. Nos.812, 702, 716-A, 680, 685, 427, 615. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied in case, directions are issued by this Court to decide the representation (Annexure P-5) moved by them within some stipulated period.

By considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide representation dated 28.02.2017 (Annexure P-5) moved by the petitioners within a period of two months Neetu Rani 2017.07.17 11:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.15058 of 2017 from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the petitioners are found to be entitled for promotion, the necessary order be passed and in case, they are not found to be entitled in any manner, the speaking order be passed. In case, any adverse order is passed, the petitioners are at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy. 14.07.2017 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE √ Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No √ Whether Reportable Yes/No Neetu Rani 2017.07.17 11:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh