High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/20437/2014disposed of

M/S Krishan Singh Rajinder Kumar & ORS v. State Of Punjab & ORS

2015-09-29Ms. Justice Navita Singh,Mr Justice Jaswant Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.20437 of 2014 Date of Decision: September 29, 2015 M/s Krishan Singh Rajinder Kumar and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.

Present: Mr.Suneet Pal Singh, Advocate, for Mr.S.S.Narula, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Rajesh Bhardwaj, Additional AG, Punjab.

Mr.Sanjiv Sharma, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2to5. -.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The impugned orders dated 27.06.2014 (P-10A to P-10C) are revisable by the State Government under Section 42 of the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961. As the above-stated statutory alternative remedy is equally efficacious, we relegate the petitioners to avail such a remedy. In case the revision petition is filed by the petitioners within one month from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order, learned counsel for the respondent-Board fairly states that no objection regarding limitation shall be taken. MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.10.01 11:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.20437 of 2014 [2] We direct the Revisional Authority to decide the revision petition on merits and in accordance with law as early as possible and preferably within a period of four months from the date of its filing.

Ordered accordingly.

Dasti.

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE September 29, 2015 [P.B.BAJANTHRI] mohinder JUDGE MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.10.01 11:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh