Sameer Ahmed v. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited and others !"
# # $% & "
Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate for the respondents.
****
!"# 1.
The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 07.12.2021 (Annexure P-5), whereby the leave period w.e.f. 01.04.2013 to 13.07.2015 has not been counted towards qualifying service for grant of 3rd ACP scale and other consequential benefits, without any
lawful justification. Further, a writ in the nature of Mandamus is sought directing the respondents to treat the aforesaid leave period as continuous service for all intents and purposes and to grant all consequential and subsequent service benefits arising therefrom. 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the representation dated 20.01.2025 (Annexure P-7) of the petitioner is decided by the respondents by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner.
3.
Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate, appearing on advanced notice, submits that he has no objection in case a direction is issued to the respondents for time-bound consideration and decision of the representation of the petitioner by passing a speaking order. 4.
Therefore, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the respondent No.3 is directed to consider the representation dated 20.01.2025 (Annexure P-7) of the petitioner and pass a speaking order, after affording him an opportunity to be heard, within a period of 03 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereof shall be conveyed to the petitioner. 5.
Needless to say, if the petitioner is found entitled to the relief sought, the same shall be granted forthwith by the respondents.
6.
Disposed of, accordingly.
# "'() *)+ !" ,$ *)+