← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/33849/2020allowed

Abdul Saeed v. State Of Haryana

2021-03-26Mr. Justice Harminder Singh Madaan3 pages

CRM-M-33849 of 2020 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1) CRM-M-33849 of 2020 (O&M) Date of decision : 26.3.2021 ...

Abdul Saeed ................Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana .................Respondent 2) CRM-M-3249 of 2021 (O&M) ...

Anjum Khan and others ................Petitioners vs.

State of Haryana .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Tanuj Sharma, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. ...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) Case taken up through video conferencing.

By this common order, I intend to dispose of two petitions bearing CRM-M-33849 of 2020 (O&M) titled as Abdul Saeed vs. State of Haryana and CRM-M-3249 of 2021 (O&M) titled as Anjum

CRM-M-33849 of 2020 -2Khan and others vs. State of Haryana, as both these petitions have arisen out of the same FIR.

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) states that petitioners have since joined the investigation and as such the present petitions be accepted.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from Inspector Raj Singh, concedes this fact, further stating that no recovery is to be effected from the petitioner(s) in both the petitions and their custodial interrogation is not required.

It being so, both the petitions are accepted. The interim bail granted to the petitioner - Abdul Saeed , vide order dated 21.12.2020 (in CRM-M-33849-2020) and petitioners- Anjum Khan and others vide order dated 25.1.2021(in CRM-M-3249-2021), is made absolute, subject to fulfillment of following conditions:- i) that the petitioners shall join the investigation as and when asked to do so by the Investigating Officer.

ii)that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer. iii)that the petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

iv)that the petitioners shall surrender their passport before the Investigating Officer and if they are not having passport then they shall file an affidavit in that regard.

CRM-M-33849 of 2020 -3In case the petitioners violate any term and condition on which the bail has been granted to them, the prosecution would be entitled to apply for cancellation of bail.

Both the petitions in that way are allowed.

( H.S. Madaan ) 26.3.2021 Judge chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No