Rajneesh Aggarwal And ANR v. State Bank Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 13542 of 2018 Decided on : 09.07.2018 Rajneesh Aggarwal and another . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Bank of India . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN PRESENT: Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Rajnish K. Jindal, Advocate for the respondent-caveator.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The prayer made in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuing direction to the respondent Bank to grant permission to the petitioners to sell the property i.e. Eldico State Villa. A further prayer for quashing of the order dated 09.05.2018 (Annexure P-5) has also been made.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that during the pendency of the writ petition, the property in dispute has already been sold by the respondentBank. Accordingly, a prayer was made that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous, therefore, he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition. 3.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (AVNEESH JHINGAN) JUDGE July 09, 2018 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jawala Ram 2018.07.11 12:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh