Rajinder Kumar v. Usha Rani

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. M-212 of 2009 Decided on : 05.01.2015 Rajender Kumar . . . Appellant

Versus

Usha Rani . . . Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SNEH PRASHAR PRESENT: None for the appellant.

Mr. Kulvir Narwal, Advocate for the respondent.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondent-wife states that he has instructions that the parties have started residing together as husband and wife. He, thus, submits that in view thereof, the present appeal has become infructuous and be disposed of as such.

2.

In such a situation, while disposing of the appeal as infructuous, it is clarified that in case the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for the respondent is found to be not correct, the appellant would be at liberty to file an application for revival of the appeal. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (SNEH PRASHAR) January 05, 2015 JUDGE J.Ram JAWALA RAM 2015.01.06 14:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh