Radhey Shyam v. State Of Haryana
CRM-M-32255-2023 :123470
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32255-2023 (O&M) Decided on: 20.09.2023 Radhey Shyam
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present:
Ms. Pooja Jaglan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Bansal, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
FIR No.
Dated Police Station Sections 25.08.2022 Matlauda District 20 of NDPS Act Panipat 1.
The petitioner incarcerated for violating the above-mentioned provisions of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) as per the FIR captioned above, has come up before this Court under Section 439 CrPC seeking bail. 2.
In para 16 of the petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents.
3.
State's counsel opposes the bail.
4.
After arguing for some time, petitioner's counsel seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with clarification that directions be issued to the trial Court to conclude the trial within the time bound manner. 5.
Given above, petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Considering the petitioner's prayer, the concerned trial court is requested to make all endeavours to conclude the trial by 31.01.2024, of which the prosecution evidence be completed by 30.12.2023, and the remaining time to provide an opportunity to the accused to lead defence evidence, if so desired, and to conclude its hearing. To meet the deadline, an endeavour be made to speed up the process for service and to pass the necessary directions in this regard. It is clarified that if expediting this trial disturbs the docket of the concerned court, then a Jyoti 2023.09.21 15:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-32255-2023 :123470 balance be struck, and if, on this account, any delay happens, then an extension can be sought by mentioning such reasons. It is clarified that this order speeding up the trial is subject to the condition that neither the petitioner shall seek any adjournment nor try to use any tactics to delay the trial. If they do so, this order of expediting the trial shall stand automatically recalled by resorting to Section 362, read with Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, without any further reference to this court. If any of the accused is on bail and fail(s) to attend the trial without any sufficient cause, then they be dealt with strictly but in accordance with law. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 20.09.2023 jyoti3 Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes Whether reportable:
No.
Jyoti 2023.09.21 15:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document