Sarita Devi v. State Of Haryana & ORS

209+104

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

ATCHANDIGARH CWP-20551-2014 Date of decision: March 10, 2022 Sarita Devi .....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Present:- None for the petitioner.

(Presence marked through Video-Conference).

Mr. Sharan Sethi, Additional AG Haryana.

Mr. Pardeep Singh Poonia, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4.

Mr. Vikas Pal Singh, Advocate for respondent No.5. ***** ARUN MONGA, J (ORAL) CM 4247-CWP-2020 For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Letter dated 23.06.2014 (Annexure A-1) is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.

Main case (O&M) Court is being held through physical mode today. However, learned counsel for the petitioner had requested to hear this Court through Video-Conference. When matter is called out, none joins proceedings on behalf of the petitioner through Video-Conference. While learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.2 to 4 tendered a copy of appointment letter dated 07.12.2021 in course of hearing, which is taken on record and marked as annexure 'A'. He MAHAVIR SINGH 2022.03.11 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

submits that in view of the appointment letter ibid, petition is rendered infructuous as the claim of the petitioner has already been accepted. Accordingly, petition is disposed of as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to revive proceedings in case appointment has not been offered.

(ARUN MONGA) JUDGE March 10, 2022 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2022.03.11 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document