Anil Bhatia v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.19914 of 2015 Date of Decision: September 18, 2015 Anil Bhatia .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH.

Present: Mr.Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate with Mr.Alok Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner claims that in the penultimate paragraph of the order dated 28.07.2015 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana, the finding re: "on Southern side one foot ahead of western corner....." is in contradiction with the finding returned immediate before that in the paragraph starting with expression "Even the Google Ariel view....."

The alleged contradiction, if any, can be appreciated by the learned Additional District Judge only and cannot be the subject matter of judicial review in exercise of writ jurisdiction.

Faced with this, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned Additional District Judge.

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.09.22 14:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.19914 of 2015 [2] We are quite sure that there is no immediate threat of demolition to the petitioner's house for a week or so within which their application can be decided. Ordered accordingly.

Dasti.

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE September 18, 2015 [JASPAL SINGH] mohinder JUDGE MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.09.22 14:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh