Subhash Chander And ORS v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CWP-19126-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP-19126-2016 Date of Decision: September 15, 2016 Subash Chander and others

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA

Present:

Ms. Anju Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners.

RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J.

The petitioners, inter alia, are aggrieved by the list of employees eligible for transfer, prepared by the respondent-Department of School Education, Haryana, the relevant extract of which is annexed as Annexure P-12 with the writ petition.

The petitioners claims themselves to be differently-abled Primary Teachers and for this reason seeks indulgence for removal of their names from the said list. A representation, dated 11.8.2016 (Annexure P14), in this regard was made by petitioner No. 11 to the authorities, which is stated to be pending with the decision-maker. The present petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to decide upon the grievance/representations of the petitioners by treating this petition as a supplementary representation within a period of 7 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. The competent authority in making its decision would consider the law in Shilpi Bose (Mrs.) v. State of Bihar, AIR 1991 SC 532 and Union of India and Prashant Kapoor 2016.09.17 12:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CWP-19126-2016 others v. S.L. Abbas, 1995 (4) SCT 455.

In the meantime, the petitioners shall not be relieved from the place of their present posting till re-examination of their cases. (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) JUDGE September 15, 2016 Pkapoor Whether Speaking/Reasoned:

YES / NO Whether Reportable:

YES / NO Prashant Kapoor 2016.09.17 12:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document