Tajinder Singh v. Punjab State Warehousing Corporation Ltd & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20090-2015 (O&M) Date of decision : 24.01.2023 Tajinder Singh ....Petitioner

Versus

Punjab State Warehousing Corporation Ltd and others ...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present :

Mr. Tahaf Bains, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. H.S. Jugait, Advocate for respondent No.3. PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Present writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to frame Promotional Policy for each cadre in the services with respondent No.1-Corporation.

Counsels are ad idem that earlier one draft Policy was made on dated 1st of February, 2016 (Annexure P/14) and was put before the Board of Directors.

Counsel for respondent No.3 submits that a subsequent Policy framed by respondent-Corporation has already been approved by the Board of Directors and is pending consideration before the State. In view of the aforesaid fact coupled with the fact that the petitioner has now retired on attaining the age of superannuation, the DEEPAK KUMAR 2023.01.25 08:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-20090-2015 (O&M) -2present writ petition which is pending consideration since 2015 is disposed off with direction to respondent No.2 that in case, the Policy gets approval from the State of Punjab, the claim of the petitioner be considered in light thereof. In case he is found to be entitled for any notional benefit, the same shall be granted to him strictly in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly.

January 24, 2023 (PANKAJ JAIN) Dpr JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR 2023.01.25 08:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document