Jeet Singh @ Jit Singh v. Ut, Chandigarh And ANR.
-- 204-B
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM-M-34416-2022(O&M) Date of Decision: 22.03.2023 JEET SINGH @ JIT SINGH ....Petitioner
Versus
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present :
Mr. Jatin Khullar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, APP., UT., Chandigarh.
Mr. Saurabh, Advocate with Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2.
HARSH BUNGER, J. (Oral) Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C is for grant of concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.64 dated 12.05.2022 registered under Sections 306 and 34 of Indian Penal code, at Police Station Mauli Jagran, UT Chandigarh. On 05.08.2022, the following order was passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court :-
!"
#
$%
&
)* +, *+**
--
!
#
.+ /.
"(
!
!
! 1
!
2
+) +3 *+** ($$..,3)*+** !
4
1 !24!- -
-
- - $ 5-6-7 5!! "
"
&
!
#
4$ 7 "# 5!
!
!
*1 - 2
$ - 4 !
-
! !
!
!
!4 ! !1 2 !- !
!
4 8 -
4 --
- 4 !
! !
- -
! 5!!
" " &
( -
5 !
!
! 5!!
#
%!
& ( ! ! *9 +9 *+** 4
- (#0 ( 4
-
- !
: " ; 4
!
4
!
-
< - --
-
!
! ! !
!- -
! ;
4
4
! !
4 ! !
!
: !
!
/:$
= - 4
!
! #
.31*2 ( "
(
!
;
4 !
!:$
-- ! 4 4 !
--
!
! - ;
-
- !
5!;
+3 +* *+*.
5 > ! !
4 !
8-
? !
-- 4 ##"
! -
(#0
- !
!
!
!
4 @ Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the petitioner has joined the investigation. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Rajesh has not disputed the aforesaid fact of joining of investigation by the petitioner and submits that his custodial interrogation is not required at this stage. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required at this stage, the present petition is allowed and the ad-interim order dated 05.08.2022 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
It is made clear that if the petitioner fails to comply with any of the directions made above and the bail conditions, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of this anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner.
The petition is accordingly disposed of.
22.03.2023 (HARSH BUNGER) Amandeep JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No