Sandeep Kumar And Others v. State Of Punjab And Another

   

      
 

     

            

 !

"   

# 

        

  $ % 

&'%

  $(

)

&'%

  $  )% *+ )&'%

       $

"

+ )&''(& !

"   !"

#  ,     %)  -         "  )   '

) . / 
 

0  

 -   



  *     * )

1  %    

 ) *

    ))2   )" ) *  *   %   !

*   


  Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he would be satisfied if the legal notice (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners is decided by respondent No.2 by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. 3.

Learned State counsel, appearing on advanced notice, submits that she has no objection in case a direction is issued to respondent No.2 for timebound consideration and decision of the legal notice of the petitioners by passing a speaking order.

NEHA 2026.05.21 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

$%
&'
%( %% 4.

Therefore, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, respondent No.2 is directed to consider the legal notice (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners in light of the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP No.12211 of 2021 titled as Hans Raj and others Vs. Pepsu Road Transport Corporation and another and other connected matter decided on 03.09.2025 (Annexure P-3) as well as the order dated 29.04.2026 (Annexure P-4) and pass a speaking order, after affording them an opportunity to be heard, within a period of 03 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereof shall be conveyed to the petitioners. Needless to say, if the petitioners are found entitled to the relief sought, the same shall be granted forthwith by respondent No.2. 5.

Disposed of, accordingly.

"  #  


(&(      3*.

   4.5    

")  4.5 NEHA 2026.05.21 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh