Suman Lata v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.1582 of 2017 Date of decision:31.01.2017 Suman Lata ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. Rajeev Anand, Advocate, for the petitioner. AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) As per the averments made in the present writ petition, though the enquiry is stated to be still pending against the petitioner, yet she has raised a question with regard to jurisdiction of the enquiry officer by relying upon the provisions of Article 243(O) of the Constitution of India and Sections 176 and 177 of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994. In my view, the apprehension of the petitioner is totally misplaced as she has not been communicated with the outcome of the enquiry report though she has been associated with it. Faced with the aforementioned situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court for withdrawal of the present writ petition with liberty to take all the pleas raised in the present writ petition before the concerned officer at an appropriate stage.

With the aforementioned observations, the writ petition is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE January 31, 2017 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2017.02.02 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh