← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/32503/2023allowed

Hem Raj v. State Of Punjab

2023-08-31Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary2 pages

CRM-M-32503-2023 2023:PHHC:114386

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32503-2023 Date of decision: 31.08.2023 Hem Raj ..Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY

Present:

Mr. Somnath Tayal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab.

*** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J.

1.

On 18.07.2023, this Court had passed the following order:- "The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.146 dated 02.06.2023, registered under Sections 420, 468, 471, 120-B IPC at Police Station Patran, Patiala.

Learned counsel contends that the petitioner is a distributor of Vodafone and Idea and issues Sim cards to customers. He has been falsely implicated in the case. The alleged incident is of year 2016, where there is no specific allegation that the said sim cards were used for committing any crime of extortion etc. and further that most of them were non-functional. In two other similar FIRs registered against the petitioner, he has been granted interim anticipatory bail by this Court vide orders dated 03.07.2023 and 11.07.2023. He is ready and willing to join investigation as and when required by the investigating agency.

Notice of motion.

At the asking of the Court, Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State.

Ankur Goyal 2023.09.01 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-32503-2023 2023:PHHC:114386 Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 25.07.2023. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated. Adjourned to 31.08.2023."

2.

Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the aforementioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur.

3.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Kulwant Singh affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 4.

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 18.07.2023 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C 5.

However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him.

( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) 31.08.2023 JUDGE Ankur Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Ankur Goyal 2023.09.01 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment