← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/19491/2016disposed of

Ding Manpower And Securities Services Pvt Ltd v. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd And ORS

2016-09-20Mr. Justice Surinder Gupta,Mr. Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 19491 of 2016 Decided on : 20.09.2016 Ding Manpower and Securities Services Pvt. Ltd. . . . Petitioner

Versus

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. & others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Ajay Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The challenge in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is to the letter dated 03.03.2016 (Annexure P1), whereby, the petitioner-company has been prohibited from participation in the future tenders, without issuing any show cause notice and affording any opportunity of hearing.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in pursuance to the orders dated 05.09.2016, passed by this Court in CWP No.18335 of 2016, titled as "Ding Manpower and Securities Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. & others", the petitioner had approached the concerned authorities pointing out the infirmities in issuing Annexure P-1. It was submitted that the petitioner had filed representations viz. Annexures P-14 & P-15 followed by reminders Annexures P-16 & P17, but no action so far has been taken thereon. 3.

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, we dispose of the writ Jawala Ram 2016.09.21 12:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh petition by directing respondent No.4 to take a decision on the

CWP No. 19491 of 2016 - 2 - representations Annexures P-14 & P-15 as well as reminders Annexures P-16 & P-17, in accordance with law by passing a speaking order and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of seven days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (KULDIP SINGH) September 20, 2016 JUDGE J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jawala Ram 2016.09.21 12:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh