Ravinder Kali Alias Rajpoot v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M No.29395 of 2025 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M No.29395 of 2025 Date of decision : 26.11.2025 Date of uploading : 26.11.2025 Ravinder Kali @ Rajpoot .............Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Harlove Singh Rajput, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG, Haryana --- SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The substantive prayer made in the petition reads thus: 'It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the petition under Section 483 read with 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of Regular Bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 257 dated 21.09.2014 under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 452, 427 of IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station Chandimandir, District Panchkula, (ANNEXURE P-1) may kindly be allowed, in the interest of justice. It is further prayed that during the pendency of the instant Petition, Interim Ball may kindly be granted to the Petitioner keeping in view his adverse medical condition.'

2.

On 28.5.2025, the following order was passed: 'The present petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 read with Section 528 of BNS for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.257 dated 21.09.2014, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 452, 427 of IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Chandimandir, District Panchkula. ASHWANI KUMAR 2025.11.26 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No.29395 of 2025 -2Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that he is confining his relief regarding interim bail only and does not press the regular bail, at this stage.

Notice of motion.

On asking of the Court, Mr. R.K. Singla, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and seeks time to file the detailed status report/custody certificate in this matter and report regarding health of the accused and treatment provided to him.

Adjourned to 11.06.2025.'

3.

In view thereof, it is clear that learned counsel for the petitioner had not pressed the regular bail at that stage, i.e. on 25.8.2025 and had pressed the relief only qua interim bail.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has sought to withdraw his plea for grant of interim bail also today, at this stage. 5.

Ordered accordingly.

(SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE 26.11.2025 Ashwanii Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No ASHWANI KUMAR 2025.11.26 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document