Sunil Kamal Walia v. State Of Haryana And ANR

CRM No.35899 of 2021 & CRM No.39053 of 2021 in/& CRM-M No.38551 of 2021 ...1...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.110 CRM No.35899 of 2021 & CRM No.39053 of 2021 in/& CRM-M No.38551 of 2021 Date of Decision: 23rd November, 2021.

Sunil Kamal Walia ...Applicant-Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana & Another

...Respondents

(Heard through Video-Conferencing) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr.Anuj Balian Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) CRM No.39053 of 2021 This application has been moved for seeking the pre- -ponement of the date of hearing in the main petition bearing CRM-M No.38551 of 2021 from 14.12.2021 to some earlier date. Notice in this application.

Mr. Apoorv Garg, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, who has joined the proceedings on behalf of respondent No.1-State in pursuance of the copy of the present application having been sent to this respondent in advance, accepts the notice and submits that he has no objection in allowing the instant application. Keeping in view the above-said fact as well as the reasons as mentioned in this application, the same is allowed and the above-said main petition is taken on the Board today itself.

SEEMA SHARMA 2021.11.24 09:45 I attest to the accuracy of this order

CRM No.35899 of 2021 & CRM No.39053 of 2021 in/& CRM-M No.38551 of 2021 ...2...

CRM-M No.38551 of 2021 (O&M) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition while submitting that it has become infructuous. Learned State counsel has no objection for the same. Resultantly, the petition in hand stands dismissed as withdrawn for having been rendered infructuous.

(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 23.11.2021.

seema Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No Whether Reportable?

Yes/No SEEMA SHARMA 2021.11.24 09:45 I attest to the accuracy of this order