Rakesh Kumaar v. State Of Punjab
!"#$%&#'()($* +,,
- . ,
!
" /////
0 ,1!2 # $ $ % &'
() &(*+,- $ ! .$ $/$ 0 , % $
$
*) , 1 (((2 0 $
$
0 % $
&&/3 & #
1* (4 &(*4 52 $0 $0 5 2 6 $ 5 $ 7
8 9 $
03 $5 # $3
: #,$ 2
; , 2 < 0 =>? $ 0
.
# ,0 $; , !
# , @
/ !A2(12!2+BB* #0 2
$ , $,2 $0 A0 ,52 $ 0
8;
, $ 0 3 $ 5 # $ $0 3 : 789 $0
. $ 52 $ $
0 C $ 0 A0
$
$$ "68 $ A0% 2
# 0 0$ $
50,5% $2 52 0A!2/
# 2 ,$0 $'1
*( 1*
)( *)
$) C &()) 0 , $ ,$ 50,5% 0
DD # $0 0 2 , 0 0 0$ $ 0,5 # $ 52 5% $ 8
# ,
$ / .21&2/2''*+ 3 % , $ $ , 0 2 , ,$0 E ,$ ** $**(( 0
0 , $ ,2 $ 0 0,5% 0
DD # , $0 , 0 0 0 $, 0,52 A!2/ 5% 8
# 0% ,5% 52 # ;0 ; E50 #3 $5
0 ,
#5%
$ #5% $0 , % , A8A $ 00
%
, $ A8 affixed his seal bearing impression 'HS' on all the parcels. After using his seal, the SHO kept the same with him. The parcels of case property etc. were handed over to MHC for depositing in the police malkhana. Production-cum-entrustment memo was prepared by the SHO. On receipt of the report of the Forensic Science Laboratory, the challan was presented in the Court.
$
&& /3 '&(5! $0 % $, 0 $ ,
'
5
$ $ C
# $ 3 $5 92* 3
:92& A!2
921 A!2:92' 52
$ 5% 92) 5 A $92B
. ! 924 52 92F
$92+ # % ) 8 % 0 1*1 !
!
0
$%
$$
0
A
5 C
A!2/ 392 * 3% $392& 0 G 0 $ # % .% %
%%#*'# 3* #'"($*) #*"#*'#
(*#
(*&#%!32"$% 4!56#*"$%%(*# && /3 *) 1 (((2 <5?(& #
!
0 0
$ % # % )( /3 "68 $ 0 # 0 ;
,$ % $
+ # 02 $ #$ ,% %,0 ,!
- $ .$ $ /$ 0 % $
# 0 , ! *( 5% ** ,0
,
# ,0 )(/3 , , , 0 0 C
0 ,
,0
5 92*#
$ 0 % $ , 5 $005% 8 0
$92) % ,
, 92F5 $
,: 0 % 5%
% 0 # 0 $ . , % % 2C
0 0 $ *& 5% 0 5
!1'7 +0 9 $
H/ 9
H/