Gurbhinder Singh @ Bhindu And Others v. State Of Punjab And Others
!"#"
$%
& &
'
(
'
' )*# '
' '
'
% +, & '
' ,
!"#$ %%%%% ' ,
- & & '() ( *+
,- !. &./&"/"/ $&0 $0.1' $"$ $. ,2
*
3 + 4 44 $&/5"/"/ 67 1"8)
) " 9&0/&"/". )) "The petitioners have approached this Court seeking quashing of FIR (Annexure P
1) and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of a compromise having been effected between the parties.
Notice of motion.
At this stage, Mr. Hemant Aggarwal, AAG, Punjab, has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No 1 State of Punjab and accepts notice.
Mr. Kunal Sarangal, Advocate has filed vakalatnama for respondents No. 2 and 3. The same be taken on record. The parties are directed to get their statements recorded qua the factum of compromise in the following manner: (i) The petitioners shall appear before the trial Court/Ilaqa Magistrate concerned on 22.01.2024 or any date thereafter as
fixed by trial Court/Ilaqa Magistrate for recording statement of the petitioners as well as of the complainant qua the factum of compromise. As and when any such appearance is made, the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate shall do the needful for recording the statements of the parties qua the factum of the compromise. It shall be open to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to either record the statement of the parties by physical process or by video conferencing as deemed appropriate by the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate.
(ii) In case the statement is to be recorded by way of video conferencing, the parties concerned shall be duly identified through video conferencing by their respective counsel, subject to the satisfaction of the Presiding Officer.
(iii) The trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate may also choose to get the statements of the parties recorded through some Commissioner, appointed by the Court who would be some Advocate having sufficient standing at the Bar. In case the statement is recorded through some Commissioner, such Commissioner/Advocate shall furnish an affidavit after recording statements to the effect that the parties had appeared before him/her and he/she had recorded their statements as per law and that the said parties had been duly identified by their respective counsel. This shall be subject to satisfaction of trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate. After recording the statements of all the affected parties in either of the aforesaid manner, the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate shall submit its report on the basis of the statements so recorded as to whether all the affected parties have entered into a compromise and as to whether the compromise in question is found to be a valid compromise and has been effected without there being any kind of influence or coercion.
The trial Court/Ilaqa Magistrate shall also report as regards the following facts after seeking information from Investigating Officer, concerned:
(i) Whether there is any other accused other than the petitioners, arrayed in this petition.
(ii) Whether there is any other complainant or affected/ aggrieved party other than the respondents, arrayed in the petition. (iii) Whether any accused has been declared Proclaimed Offender?
The report be submitted before this Court before the next date of hearing i.e. 22.02.2024."
$
/:/""/".4 ;
,2 <
) * 2
) 1 "Statement of Investigating Officer ASI Sukhbir Singh No.14/FZR, Police Station Makhu has also been recorded on 24.01.2024. He stated that in the present case FIR No. 4 dated 14.01.2020, under sections 315, 354 B, 323, 34 of Indian Penal Code was registered at Police Station Makhu
on the statement of Parkash Kur wife of Gurcharan Singh against the petitioners/accused. He further stated that no other accused arrayed in the present FIR except the present petitioners/accused. No other complainant ог affected/aggrieved party except the present respondents in the present petition. He further stated that none of the accused is declared prociaimed offender nor proceeding of proclamation are pending against any of the accused. Challan is not prepared. He further stated that Parkash Kaur is victim/complainant in the present FIR. After going through the statements of the parties and on asking the parties, it is crystallized clear that the compromise has been arrived at genuinely and is made voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence.
As per the statement of Investigating Officer, in the present FIR there is no other accused other than the petitioners, arrayed in this petition. As per the statement of Investigating Officer no other complainant affected/aggrieved party except the present the present petition. He further stated that none of the accused is declared proclaimed offender nor proceeding of proclamation are pending against any of the accused. As per the statement of Investigating Officer, challan is not prepared in this case till today.
complainant in the present FIR."
. = !"#$ 4 4
44
,-
+ +
0 4 (
,-+
4467 1"8 > ,
2
( ?
2 @A 72
( ) 7
.5" 2+
14
!
"#
!
$ %& '
'
!
( "
# )) " *%# )* +% , - !
"# )) " *%#
" *% .++% / 0 1 0 +* !
#
)
44 ( @A 72 2 (a) Power u/s 482 Cr.P.C. vested with this Court is much wider and is unaffected by Section 320 of the Code.
(b) However, wider the power greater the caution. (c) The underlining principle while exercising such power is that it can be invoked to quash the proceedings recognizing compromise between the parties in the matters which are overwhelmingly and predominantly of civil character like commercial transactions or arising out of matrimonial relationship or family disputes.
(d) The said power is not to be exercised in the prosecutions involving heinous and serious offences of mental depravity or offences like murder, rape, dacoity etc. as such offences are not private in nature and have a serious impact on society.
(e) Section 482 Cr.P.C. casts duty upon the High Court to advance interest of justice as well. It is in recognition of this duty casted upon the High Court, that Apex Court held that the High Court would not refuse to quash FIR under Section 307 merely because FIR finds mention thereof. High Court can assess nature of injuries sustained, whether such injuries inflicted on vital/delicate parts of the body/nature of weapons used etc. (f) Such exercise at the hands of High Court would be permissible only after the evidence is collected after investigation and chargesheet is filed/ charges framed during the trial. Such exercise
cannot be carried out while the matter is still under investigation.
(g) While quashing FIR in non compoundable offences even which are of private in nature, High Court is required to consider antecedents of the accused, conduct of the accused and whether he was absconding or whether he has managed the complainant to enter into a compromise.
5 =
)
4 1 i) Ranjeet Kumar versus State of H.P. & Ors. in case CRM
M 648 of 2023 decided on 08.12.2023 by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla.
ii) Arif Khan versus The State and another in case W.P. (CRL) 1064/2023 decided on 09.01.2024 by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi.
iii) Sukhchain Singh and others versus State of Punjab and others 2021(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 81.
iv) Ananda DV Vs. State and another 2021 SCC Online SC 3423.
:
*) 4 2
7
B.5"22+
,- 1 (i) Putting a quietus to the proceedings will bring peace and tranquility amongst parties & will accordingly further the cause of substantial justice.
(ii) The offences alleged are primarily of private nature. (iii) As per the report received the compromise is said to be voluntary in its nature.
(iv) Complainant/victim is reported to have entered into compromise on his own volition.
&/ 2+ ( ) ,-!. &./&"/"/ $&0$0.1'$"$$.,2
*
3 + 4 44 $&/5"/"/ 67 1"8 ( +
+
&& 68 (
.' ,/
&/"/".
jatin *B DB! DB!