Free Bird Abroad Consultant v. State Of Haryana And ANR

 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH


 Decided on: 20.11.2025     

......Petitioner
Versus


     

......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA

Present:




 
 
 

 


 



 



 




 
 

 

  
!"
****
SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral)
#
 




$   

%&'
!()*
 ""##"+"*
 

, 
 
-
  
./ 
!


 
*+0
*"+
& 1

 
#+

"*

&//  
 

2


// 

34 
5"6
 

2

  
"
7
2

%&'

 


/


/, 8  
!"5 9/ 
/
(
:
 

/ 
  
!"
 

1  

  ,

,




2 

%&'



 -2-  

$  


2


 

//
 

2

2

  

*
 

  

, / 
 

 ,
1 8&,,$
 






/


,,


 
 






,


 


 

// 
;
&
/, 


/

1 

,
  

,

 ,
 
 25 


- 
,
 /


 

2
 


  

/ 


// 










, 

 /





6.

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and for respondent No.2 are ad idem that in view of the settlement effected between the parties, the present petition deserves to be accepted. It has also come on record that the aforesaid compromise is genuine and the parties effected the same without any undue influence or coercion. 7.

In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated further in the present case. Thus, continuation of the criminal proceedings between the parties would be a futile exercise and sheer wastage of time of the Court and thus, amounts to abuse of process of law.
)
%

 
5 

 



,
,


2 <2,
4
1 

   

    

 
    

% 


-



 -31 
! " 

 # 

 

 $ %     


,,

%&'
!()*


""##"+"*
 

, 
 
-
  
./ 
!

 
*+0
*"+
& 1

 
#+

"*

&//  

are hereby quashed qua the petitioners,
2

 /

' #+ +++85

 

2
 
  

=,
 
 

9 , 
 
!##>+#"()#"(
&%1
1 ?-&!++++*#@"


-9

&


5#*
9 ,
>
' 



 

 

 
2


 2

1 
 
&

/ 
,


 


    

 


/


"+#""+";

 
 
,,
2
/

2

/ 
(SUBHAS MEHLA)
JUDGE
20.11.2025
Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO
Whether Reportable:

YES/NO