Manoj Kumar And ORS. v. State Of Punjab And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 9683 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.07.2024 Manoj Kumar and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents
Present :
None for the petitioners.
Mr. Salil Sabhlok, Sr. Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ****
The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for the following substantial relief:-
!
"! # $ % &
' ( ) % * (
+ '
,
' +
- ( ) . 2.
This petition was filed by eight persons who were residents of the area concerned where construction of 100 feet wide metalled road was stalled on account of certain encroachments made by one of the plot holder and the said plot holder having been protected by status quo order passed in Civil Writ Petition Nos. 16232 and 16455 of 1994.
RAVINDER KUMAR 2024.07.24 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
[2] 3.
Learned counsel for respondent No.3-Municipal Corporation, Bathinda has filed a reply inter-alia revealing that both the aforesaid Civil Writ Petitions wherein status quo had been granted have been dismissed vide order dated 05.02.2024, whereafter, the Municipal Corporation has removed all the encroachments and started construction of the road in question. 4.
In view of the aforesaid subsequent developments and the fact that the Municipal Corporation has started construction of the road in question, it would be appropriate that this petition be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to revisit the Court in case any of their grievances remains unaddressed.
5.
Disposed of.
(SHEEL NAGU) CHIEF JUSTICE (VIKAS SURI) JUDGE 23.07.2024 ravinder Whether speaking/reasoned √Yes/No Whether reportable √Yes/No RAVINDER KUMAR 2024.07.24 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document