Dharambir And ORS. v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

CWP-1626-2017 -1HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1626-2017 Date of Decision: January 31, 2017 Dharambir and others .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Mr.H.S.Dhillon, Advocate for Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners ........

SURYA KANT, J.

The petitioners have filed the instant writ petition on an apprehension that the Gram Panchayat is likely to dispossess them forcibly from the land under their occupation, which is claimed to be owned by them.

It is difficult from the material on record to infer that there is any attempt to forcibly dispossess the petitioners. However, if there is any such move, they may approach the BDPO/DDPO to look into the matter in accordance with law. They have also got alternative remedy to institute a Meenu 2017.02.07 09:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CWP-1626-2017 -2suit under Section 13-A of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (as applicable to State of Haryana) and if so advised, may invoke that alternative remedy.

Disposed of.

( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE January 31, 2017 ( SUDIP AHLUWALIA ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2017.02.07 09:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh