Jarnail Singh @ Jaila v. State Of Haryana & ORS

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16323-2017 Date of Decision: July 26, 2017 Jarnail Singh @ Jaila .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Dr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.

........

SURYA KANT, J.

Pursuant to two separate eviction applications filed against the petitioner, one by the Gram Panchayat and another by private persons, two eviction orders have been passed against him. The petitioner has filed two appeals alongwith stay applications. As no order on the stay applications has been passed, the aggrieved petitioner has filed the instant writ petition. [2] Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any views on merit, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Collector, Kaithal, to decide the stay applications filed by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. [3] Let status quo re: demolition be maintained for a period of two weeks.

( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE July 26, 2017 ( SUDHIR MITTAL ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2017.07.28 10:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh