Dharambir And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16399-2017 Date of Decision: July 27, 2017 Dharambir and another .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

........

SURYA KANT, J.

The order has been passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Sonepat, observing that road in dispute was constructed way back in the year 1982 and thereafter has been repaired many times by PWD (B&R) Department. The petitioners, however, insists that the alignment of the road is now being changed.

Since the writ petition raises disputed questions of fact, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the same with liberty to approach the higher authorities including the Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak.

Ordered accordingly.

Let such higher authorities consider the petitioners' claim. ( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE July 27, 2017 ( SUDHIR MITTAL ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2017.07.28 10:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh