High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/19983/2016disposed of

Priksha Kumari v. State Of Punjab & ORS.

2019-02-07Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

CWP-19983-2016 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-19983-2016 Date of decision: - 07.02.2019 Priksha Kumari ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Ms. Alka Chatrath, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Mehardeep Singh, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) Petitioner has filed the present writ petition for the grant of benefit of ACP after completion of 4 years and 9 years service. During the course of hearing today, counsel for the respondents have produced an order dated 26.04.2018, by which the benefit, as being claimed in the present writ petition, has already been allowed to the petitioner and even the arrears on account of said benefit have also been released to her. The relevant documents have been supplied to counsel for the petitioner.

Counsel for the petitioner express ignorance about the passing of the said order and the grant of the said benefit to the petitioner. NARESH KUMAR 2019.02.13 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-19983-2016 -2Once the respondents have made a statement and has produced the order including voucher vide which the payment was made to the petitioner, the statement cannot be disbelieved. Hence, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and the same stands disposed of as such. However, in case it is found that the relief as claimed in the present writ petition was not actually given to the petitioner, she will be at liberty to approach this Court again.

( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) February 07, 2019 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes Whether reportable?

No NARESH KUMAR 2019.02.13 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh