Rakesh Sharma v. Sushma Sharma And ORS

CR-4202-2023 - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CR-4202-2023 Decided on : 20.10.2023 Rakesh Sharma . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

Sushma Sharma and others . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Rose Gupta, Advocate, Ms. Neha Anand Mahajan, Advocate, Ms. Hardeep Kaur, Advocate and Ms. Garima Modi, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Aashna Aggarwal, Advocate and Mr. Karan Singla, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 6.

**** SANJAY VASHISTH , J. (Oral) 1.

By way of present revision petition, plaintiff/decree holder (petitioner herein) has challenged the order dated 13.03.2023 (Annexure P12), passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Amritsar, in the execution proceedings, vide which, issues have been framed on the objections filed by the objectors-respondents No.2 to 6. 2.

In pursuance to the notice issued by this Court on 28.07.2023, Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate assisted by Ms. Aashna Aggarwal, Advocate, is appearing on behalf of respondents No.2 to 6. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner (plaintiff) is involved in the present litigation since the year 2016, and a suit for possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell, was decreed in his favour. He further submits that without challenging the JAWALA RAM 2023.10.21 12:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CR-4202-2023 - 2 - impugned order 13.03.2023 (P-12), he would be satisfied, if a direction is issued to decide the issues framed by the Executing Court vide impugned order (P-12), in a time bound manner. Even respondents plead no objection to this submission.

4.

Learned Sr. counsel appearing on behalf of the objectors - respondents No.2 to 6, also makes a statement that objectors/respondents No.2 to 6 would make all sincere efforts to complete their evidence within four months from today, and they would not take any further time beyond the time stated by him before this Court.

5.

Heard.

6.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, and taking note of the fact that all the Courts are burdened with the voluminous work, present revision petition is disposed of, by making an observation that the Executing Court would make all possible endeavour to decide the issues finally within a period of 18 months from today.

A copy of this order be forwarded to the learned Executing Court i.e. Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Amritsar, for compliance. (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE October 20, 2023 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2023.10.21 12:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document