Anil Kumar And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 20143 of 2016 Decided on : 03.10.2016 Anil Kumar and another . . . Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. P.S. Poonia, Advocate for the petitioners.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India inter alia for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondents to fulfill the promises made by them in the advertisement (Annexure P-1 Colly) and to further provide all the basic amenities to the petitioners.

2.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioners either to approach the Civil Court or to take action before the appropriate authority under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, in accordance with law. 3.

Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioners to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to them, in accordance with law.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (RAMENDRA JAIN) October 03, 2016 JUDGE J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jawala Ram 2016.10.04 12:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh