Jarnail Singh v. State Of Punjab And ORS.
-1CWP No.2112 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CWP No.2112 of 2015 Date of decision: 09.02.2015 Jarnail Singh ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
2) To be referred to the Reporters or not ?
3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: - Mr. Kshitij Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL) Instant writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for direction to the respondents to grant rightful claim to the petitioner under the provisions of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of succession certificate issued in the name of father of the petitioner, his claim for land has not been finalised. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has approached the authorities in this regard but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that direction may be issued to consider the claim of the petitioner in accordance with law. Instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the RAVINDER SINGH 2015.02.09 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
-2CWP No.2112 of 2015 authorities to look into the grievance of the petitioner as depicted in the writ petition. The writ petition shall be treated as a representation. Needful shall be done as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. It is made clear that representation will not mean condonation of delay in the claim.
(Paramjeet Singh) Judge February 09, 2015 R.S.
RAVINDER SINGH 2015.02.09 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document