Pardeep Alias Murari And Another v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-30118 of 2019 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.11.2019 Pardeep @ Murari and Anr.

....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU

Present:

Mr. Rampal Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Parveen Kumar Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana.

HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, J.

Crl.M.No.35210 of 2019 Application is allowed.

Petitioner is permitted to add Section 325 IPC in the head note of the petition.

Registry to carry out necessary corrections in the memo of parties.

Main case Prayer is for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.192 dated 08.05.2019 under Sections 323,325 and 506 read with Section 34 IPC registered at P.S Ganaur, District Sonepat.

The allegations in the FIR registered on the complaint of Tej Partap Singh are that the petitioner along with his co-accused caused injuries to the complainant with an iron rod. Learned State counsel opposes the prayer stating that the offence is grievous in nature as the complainant suffered head injury with fracture ulna left in the incident.

No ground is made out to grant the concession of anticipatory bail.

Dismissed.

November 15, 2019 (Harinder Singh Sidhu) manoj Judge Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2019.11.16 17:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document