Ram Mehar And ANR v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33556-2020 Decided on : 07.01.2021 Ram Mehar and another . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL PRESENT: Mr. Fateh Saini, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Rajiv Goel, DAG, Haryana assisted by ASI Subhash Chand.

Mr. Pawan Attri, Advocate for the respondents No.2 and 3.

**** MANJARI NEHRU KAUL , J. (Oral) The instant petition is for quashing of FIR No. 10, dated 31.01.2017, lodged under Sections 406, 498-A, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Kaithal Sadar, Haryana (Annexure P-1) and all the consequential proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise arrived at, between the parties.

Vide order dated 27th October, 2020 of this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court on 01st December, 2020, to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between them.

Report has since been received from the learned ACJM, Kaithal, in pursuance to the direction of this Court, wherein, the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report compromise has indeed been effected between JAWALA RAM 2021.01.08 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their

CRM-M-33556-2020 - 2 - free will and the complainant has also made statement to the effect that she would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioners is quashed. The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in original, alongwith its report.

Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioners and respondents No.2 and 3 is the only aggrieved person in the FIR in question.

In view of the report of the learned ACJM, Kaithal and the principles laid down by the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE January 07, 2021 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2021.01.08 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh