High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/15038/2018disposed of

Sai Enterprises v. The State Of Haryana And Others

2018-06-01Mr. Justice R.C. Kathuria (Retd.),Mr Justice Rajiv Sharma2 pages

CWP No.15038 of 2018 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.15038 of 2018 Date of decision: 01.06.2018 M/s Sai Enterprises .... Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA

Present:

Mr. Vikas P. Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** Ajay Kumar Mittal, Acting Chief Justice (Oral) 1.

In this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the order dated 14.05.2018 (Annexure P-3) passed by Executive Engineer on behalf of respondent No.3 whereby work allotted to the petitioner has been given to respondent No.3. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order dated 14.05.2018 has been passed without affording an opportunity to the petitioner. He, however, prayed that liberty be granted to the petitioner to file a detailed and comprehensive representation before respondent No.2 by incorporating the grievance as raised in the present writ petition and a direction be issued to the authority concerned to decide the representation expeditiously in a time bound manner in accordance with law. 3.

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, perusing the present petition and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the Sonia Bura 2018.06.05 11:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

CWP No.15038 of 2018 -2case, we dispose of the present petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed and comprehensive representation raising all the pleas as raised in the present writ petition to respondent No.2. It is directed that in the event of a representation being filed by the petitioner within a period of five days from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order, the same shall be decided in accordance with law by passing a speaking order and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of the representation. The petitioner shall be entitled to lead any evidence to substantiate his claim before the concerned authority.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE 01.06.2018 (TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA) sonia JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking?

Yes/No Whether reportable?

Yes/No Sonia Bura 2018.06.05 11:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh