Sandeep Kumar Alias Sandi v. State Of Punjab
1 IN TH HE HIGH COURT FOR THE E STATES OF PUNJAB AND HANDIGARH HARYANA AT CH **+,- -.
30
*4$+$* **+
$$$
/ 00 0 $$$ 0
(
!"# $%& '(# (
!
' Mr. * +", & , !% - .',,,/ 0
!
' )%$
1& " & % %
5
2, 3 6 & " ! "4 %"- %7*8
$ %
$,',%
9 "% +(" % "( & %" &%"' &
1 & & " & % %" & ""'& &"% ' % % 1&( " ( "
" && " " ) .(! (
* ""'& &"% '% 7*8 9
# %
9
6
:
:2 65 #2#65
256 256
5 %
$ ,' ,% "% " % , ( % &%"
&& & "" " " ) % (% " %%"" " "'" %" &%"'
' & - & %" &%"' &( ""( &&&% &%
"( . 0 )&% % .% '& " " %' ; ,, !%/ /"0 !% % & ' * ' ' ''& &"
%" &%"' & ( ( ' &% ) * & " " '
*! " %" &% "" ! "'"&"
"% %
:
< ! " %
" % "& !""&" & " ")' &%"'&%
&"" %"'&%"' & * ' % & '&
' '" """ " " ( "" % "&% '
$ ,' "&"% % ("" %&= =' & " ")!"
% " "( &( ( %! % ! " " ) % &%"' '
, &" ( " ") & "%&%"' %
&&% & %
(%% "'"( &!" % 3% & " "% % (% ( !" &! %#2 6
8"% % &"% &Rohit Kumar Vs. S State 2008 Crl. J. 2561. of Delhi :
,&"
!"&%"' (%!
! "%
&% &&% " )
(% ' & ( ' & 5 % &&% " " ) .% ' ( % %" !" &!%#2 6&(%&% ' "5 !%% '
'
& "%&%"'(% %' 8" % % &"% &Gurap ppa Gugal and others Vs. Stat te of 1969 CriLJ 826 and Shokat Ali Mysore : 1 Vs. State of Haryna : 2020(2) R RCR
5 ) 339.7, while adjourning g the case to 05.05.2025 to comp plete (Criminal) the manda atory period of 30 days, the learn ned trial Court failed to consider r the fact that %"
!3 '
' '&" 0% & %"'( & " %& ( ( % & "% &%"' &% & ( " 5 8% %3 % ' $"
! "## ,%% "!(
%' ! " !( "(" ( !% & & ""( '&
2,3 6 & " !" 4 4 %" - % 7*8
$ %
$ ,',% 9"% +(" % " ( & %"
&%"' & (""% "&% '
+&!(% & 0 )&% % (%("
!" "&& %%" " % % " ")(& # ('
' " ")"""'
' " 0 %& "> %
1"" &&% & " " ) ""'
+
*' %"% &"&& "
")(&"
'&"" '
' '
'
.(! " "" 0% &' % 8
> & & ( %;"!
!% , ; + (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE *4$+$**+
Whet ther speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whet ther reportable Yes/No