Mishal Dabbas v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

Criminal Misc. No.M-30288 of 2019 .....

Date of decision:24.07.2019 Mishal Dabbas

...Petitioner

v.

State of Haryana

...Respondent

....

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....

Present:

Mr. N.S. Shekhawat, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Chetan Sharma, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

Mr. Ashwani Bakshi, Advocate for the complainant. .....

Inderjit Singh, J.

This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.79 dated 26.02.2019 registered for the offences under Sections 323, 341, 342, 365, 379-B, 120-B and 34 IPC and Section 3(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 at Police Station Indri, District Karnal. Notice of motion to Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Chetan Sharma, learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and Mr. Ashwani Bakshi, learned Advocate has appeared for the complainant and contested this petition.

HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2019.07.25 15:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-30288 of 2019 [2] I have heard learned counsel for the parties as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. A perusal of the record shows that the injuries are stated to be caused to the complainant which are under Section 323 IPC etc. and are mainly simple in nature with blunt weapon. As per the allegations, the complainant was taken in the car earlier to one shop then to the house of the present petitioner and beating is alleged.

The petitioner has been in judicial custody since 30.05.2019. He is not required for interrogation purposes. The trial of the case is likely to take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the final disposal of the case. Therefore, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case; without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

July 24, 2019.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hasp* NOTE:

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2019.07.25 15:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh