← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/20654/2016disposed of

Dharampal v. State Of Haryana & ORS

2018-11-21Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

CWP-20654-2016 (O&M) -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-20654-2016 (O&M) Date of decision: - 21.11.2018 Dharampal ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Charanjit Singh Bakhshi, Additional A.G., Haryana Mr. Sahil Garg, Advocate for Mr. Sumit Jain, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5.

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) In the present case the petitioner had approached this Court with a prayer that the work charge/daily wages service rendered by him from 1980 till 1993 be counted for determining the pensionary benefits. Notice of motion was issued.

In pursuance to the notice, reply has been filed today in Court and the same is taken on record.

In paragraph 3 of the reply, it has been mentioned that the daily wage services of the petitioner from 1980 to 1993 has been counted for determining the pensionary benefits and the pension of the petitioner NARESH KUMAR 2018.11.26 14:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-20654-2016 (O&M) -2has already been revised and on account of the same, a total sum of `3,28,741/- has been paid to the petitioner on 29.04.2017 and nothing more is required to be paid.

Counsel for the petitioner does not oppose the statement so made.

In view of the above, no grievance of the petitioner survives in the present writ petition and accordingly, the same stands disposed of as no further order is required to be passed. ( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) November 21, 2018 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes Whether reportable?

No NARESH KUMAR 2018.11.26 14:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh