Narinder Kumar Sharma & ORS v. Sbop
!" #$%$!& '( ( )*+ *,+
+)-
* .-*(+* +-
* +- /(01 ! "
##$%##&' ( )"
)
+ # ! + +*, -
)- -)- )( !
.)
" /&0. /&1 ' % - %' )!
-
* - " * "
2
+ "
- - ! + .0* " 2 + 1/$ *
2# &,3 * !
)
4
"
!
!* - -5
+ ) +* * +
"
*- "" 2 - # /&/ 2#-# # /&&! ""
0
judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Director General, Doordarshan Prasar Bharti Corporation of India and another vs. Magi H. Desai, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 336, State of Himachal Pradesh and another vs. Sheela Devi 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1272 and Uday Pratap Thakur and another vs. State of Bihar and others, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 527, the period during which the petitioners have worked as temporary employees should be counted for the purpose of retiral benefits. The respondent has issued circular dated 15.10.1982 whereby case of all those employees who were terminated has been re-considered. All employees who prior to their termination had worked for minimum 240 days in a year have been paid back wages. The respondent by paying back wages for the period during which employees did not work on account of termination has accepted that period of temporary service should be counted for the purpose of qualifying service for pension as well as other retiral benefits. 1
"
+*
+-
*
"
6 +
*
* ! * ! -
+-
.
* "
! - "
6 +
- *- "
6
'
+ - - +* -!*
+ !* ) " - -
*
* , I have heard arguments of both sides and scrutinized the record with their able assistance.
$ ! ""
" /&0. /&1- ) -
)
*
! + !* " * "
!* - +* - +
"
!
+-
"
" 2 -
"
* # /&/ - -
* & # /&1 & 7
.
"
'
*
"
8
9 ' "
-
* + "
6 +
* !
"
*
-
+-
*
* "
*
+
+ ! -
"
+
* - *
- +* - ! "
+ " -
*
! - *
"
! -
+-
"
! +* , 3 /:#
! 4 ++)-"
-+)+) +
#13 * !
* !*- )+)+
- *
" ! "
*+ : (
'
"" + / (-)+
"
+
"*
0* +-3 03##3#1 ;
)"% < %2