Pinki v. State Of Haryana And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-15909-2026 Date of Decision: 20.05.2026 PINKI

...Petitioner

Vs.

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Lokesh Shivansh, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Addl. A.G. Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of communication whereby her claim for compensation under Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Antyodaya Parivar Suraksha Yojna (for short 'Deen Dayal Yojna') has been rejected on the ground of delay. 2.

As per petition, the petitioner's husband passed away on 03.11.2023. He was 33 years old. His annual family income as per Parivar Pehchan Patra was less than Rs.1,80,000/-. The petitioner filed online application on 05.03.2024 seeking compensation under Deen Dayal Yojna. The respondent has rejected her claim on the ground that application was filed beyond 90 days.

DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.05.20 15:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP-15909-2026 -23.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instant case is squarely covered by order dated 27.03.2026 passed in CWP-9253-2026. 4.

Learned State counsel expressed her inability to controvert applicability of aforesaid judgment to the instant case. 5.

In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition is hereby allowed in terms of order dated 27.03.2026 passed in CWP-9253-2026. 6.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE May 20, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.05.20 15:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment