Dharampal v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.21815 of 2015 Date of Decision: October 12, 2015 Dharampal ....Petitioner versus The State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.

Present: Mr.Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The only direction given by this Court vide order dated 10.11.2014 (P-7) was that while giving effect to the eviction order passed against the petitioner, which has attained finality, his request to provide a passage to his house may be considered. In deference thereto, the Sub Divisional Officer (Civil), Rewari has issued a memo dated 26.08.2015 (P-10) in which it is categorically recorded that B.D.P.O., Bawal has been instructed to provide passage to the petitioner's house from Khasra No.89.

In our considered view, the above-stated decision taken by the authorities is sufficient compliance of the order dated 10.11.2014. If the petitioner has a claim to any other MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.10.13 11:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.21815 of 2015 [2] additional or better passage, which was not the subject-matter of dispute in earlier eviction proceedings, he may raise such a claim before an appropriate forum and in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly.

Dasti.

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE October 12, 2015 [P.B.BAJANTHRI] mohinder JUDGE MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.10.13 11:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh