Kamlesh v. State Of Haryana And Others

NJAB & HARYANA ARH IN N THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIGA KAMLESH CWP-16009-2026 Date of decision: May 27, 2026 r

...Petitioner

Versus

HARYANA AND OTHERS STATE OF H s

...Respondents

BHUVAN DAHIYA

CORAM:

Present:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIB Mr. Yesh Paul Malik, Advocate Mr. Ankur Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Additiona Mr. Mayank Garg, Advocate wit Ms. Komal, Advocate and Mr. Parveen Singh, Advocate for respondent no.3.

and al Advocate General, Haryana.

th TRIBHUVAN N DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed inter r alia seeking a writ of certiorari i quashing the e office order dated 20.11.2024 4, Annexure P-8, whereby the e ed from ₹38,300 to ₹31,400, as petitioner's l last pay drawn has been reduce s also the due retiral benefits on that basis. A Apparently, the order has been n passed witho out issuing any show cause not tice or affording opportunity of f hearing to the e petitioner.

2.

Learned counsel for the Univers sity, on instructions, submits that t it has been d decided to reconsider the issue of refixation of the petitioner's s pay and pass a fresh order after affording an o opportunity of hearing to her.

JASPREET KAUR 2026.05.29 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-16009-2026 -23.

In view thereof, the petition is disposed of, setting aside the office order dated 20.11.2024 with liberty to the University to pass a fresh reasoned order after issuing a show cause notice to the petitioner and taking her response thereto into account, in accordance with law. May 27, 2026 (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) Jaspreet Kaur JUDGE  Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No JASPREET KAUR 2026.05.29 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh