High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/21825/2015disposed of

Vikas Mundlia And ORS. v. Institute Of Banking Personnel Selection And ORS.

2016-02-24Mr Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain2 pages

KAPIL 2016.03.03 10:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-21825-2015 [1] *** In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CWP-21825-2015 Date of Decision:24.02.2016 Vikas Mundlia and others

...Petitioners

Versus

Institute of Banking Personnel Selection and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

Present:

Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Aayush Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Mr. R.N. Lohan, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

***** SABINA, J.

Petitioners have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned letter dated 04.08.2015. At the time of issuance of notice of motion, following order was passed by this Court on 13.10.2015:- "Grievance of the petitioners is that similarly situated persons have been given option for consideration of their candidature in the open (general) category for appointment in the Bank whereas, such an opportunity has been denied to them. It is submitted that

KAPIL 2016.03.03 10:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-21825-2015 [2] *** petitioners do not seek any reservation in terms of the notification which has been set aside by the Hon'ble Supreme Court however, they seek an opportunity to opt for being treated as open (general) category candidates.

Notice of motion for 27.11.2015.

Dasti as well."

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners do not want to pursue their claim with regard to challenge of letter dated 04.08.2015.

Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has submitted that the case of the petitioners for appointment was considered under General category candidates and they have not made it successfully for appointment with the Bank in General category.

In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for respondent No.1, this petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.

February 24, 2016 (SABINA) kapil JUDGE