High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/17308/2017disposed of

Baldev Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

2023-05-04Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 2023:PHHC:064324 CWP-17308-2017 Date of decision: 04.05.2023 BALDEV SINGH ..Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

Present:

Mr. B.S. Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. D.K. Singal, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J(Oral) The petitioner prays for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondents to regularize his services. Though, a copy of the reply dated 12.05.2022 is not part of the paperbook, however, the learned counsel representing the State of Punjab produced a copy thereof, which is taken on record.

Para 4 of the aforesaid affidavit reads as under:- "4. That the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (HOFF) Punjab respondent No.2 consider the representation of Petitioner and sent his report to Divisional Forest Officer, Rupnagar vide his letter No.6987 dated 21.12.2021 that the Chairman Screening review Committee, Ferozepur issued final seniority list on dated 29.10.2021 of daily wages laborers/daily wagers Drivers up to dated 31.03.2021, in which this Laborers name are listed at serial No.444, According to seniority list these Laborers shown completed 19 years as on dated 31.03.2021. So if the Punjab Government in future introduces any notification regarding regularization of Adhoc Contractual, daily wage, temporary out sourced etc. worker then the necessary action may be taken for regularization of these workers and may be consider according to seniority list and as per provision of policy and in view of conditions issued by the Government in the policy. (A copy of letter No.6987 dated 21.12.2021 attached as Annexure R-1)."

MOHD AYUB 2023.05.05 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

CWP-17308-2017 -2The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that he has no objection if the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the stand taken by the respondent-State in para 4, which has been extracted above. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of.

May 04th, 2023 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) Ay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No MOHD AYUB 2023.05.05 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.