Vinod Salaria v. Municipal Corporation Pathankot
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CWP No.21837 of 2015 Date of decision: 14.10.2015 Vinod Salaria ....Petitioner
Versus
Municipal Corporation, Pathankot ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
2) To be referred to the Reporters or not ?
3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: - Mr. Rajeshwar Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL) Instant writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 08.09.2015 (Annexure P19) passed by the respondent - Municipal Corporation, whereby claim of the petitioner has been declined.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
Petitioner has not been inducted as a tenant rather he has been alleged to be a trespasser in the shop in question. Thus, no ground for indulgence in the impugned order is made out. Dismissed. However, petitioner will be at liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law.
(Paramjeet Singh) October 14, 2015 Judge R.S.
RAVINDER SINGH 2015.10.15 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
RAVINDER SINGH 2015.10.15 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document